Guest Post: Andrea Humez — Food on Stage

As a director of low-budget, low-tech community theatre, I often find myself evaluating scripts I’d like to direct on the basis of whether they have some sort of insurmountable logistical challenge. Fortunately I have friends willing to build me shower stalls and moving person-shaped pistol targets (Hapgood), and canopy beds (The Lion In Winter). The full nudity in Indian Ink and the multi-level rotating set in Noises Off are still beyond my current means. But at least these (with the possible exception of the pistol targets) are vital to the plot of their respective plays. More irksome are technical effects that serve minor purposes, yet are difficult to omit: for example, the dagger thrown into a painting and smashed wine glass in A Little Night Music.

Food on stage can fall anywhere along the spectrum. In The Importance of Being Earnest the eating (and squabbling over) very specific food items is an integral element of the dialogue. In Rabbit Hole, a different, highly specific dessert is eaten in nearly every scene; but while the constant serving of food does serve to illustrate something about Becca’s character and her relationship with her family, the creme caramel and lemon squares never quite play the focal role in a scene that the cucumber sandwiches do in Earnest. In Frankie and Johnny in the Claire de Lune, preparing and eating food are part of the characters’ negotiation of their relationship — but the food required is milk, meatloaf, and a vegetable omelet that an actor must prepare during the scene, so the play requires not only food, but a working refrigerator and, ideally, a working stove. And how many actors want to eat cold meatloaf — or worse, tepid, meatloaf — in the middle of a performance? Or kiss someone who has just done so?

The thing that really baffles me is the number of 10-minute plays that
require food — sometimes not just a cup of coffee or a couple of
cookies, but something elaborate and messy like a plate of chicken and
pasta. 10-minutes plays are usually performed as a set, where
keeping props and scenery to a minimum is important for quick set
changes. Sometimes, the food is central, as in a play I recently saw
about two women whose job is to prepare the last meal for prisoners
about to be executed. If that’s the subject of your play, then the food is necessary — and there’s nothing an apple pie under construction for a good concrete, specific image. But if it’s incidental, why not make everyone’s life easier and leave it out?

Beverages are somewhat less problematic, because they can often be faked with empty cups or colored water. But if you want a character to throw a drink in another character’s face, consider the logistical ramifications: colored water on costumes, wet floor until the next scene change, possible damage to makeup. . . And that’s assuming that your `whisky’ or `brandy’ is colored water and not, say, iced tea mixed with cranberry juice. In the latter case, you will have something colored and sticky all over set and costumes. Also, it takes longer to consume a serving of beverage than most scripts allow. Unless the characters are slugging back shots, the scene can become a race to empty their glasses in time to ask for a refill.

Similarly, it takes a painfully long time to consume food on stage, especially if the eating character has the next line. (Have you ever hollowed out chocolates so that they would contain as small a volume of chocolate as possible while still reading as bon-bons to the audience? Chocolate is particularly tricky to speak through.)

Now, it must be admitted that theatre people delight in logistical challenges; that’s where all our most cherished anecdotes seem to come from. So go ahead, put that roast turkey dinner in your script. Generations of actors and stage hands will happily curse your name.

5 Comments

Filed under Guest Post

5 Responses to Guest Post: Andrea Humez — Food on Stage

  1. Jessica Raine

    You’ve probably heard me kvetch about perishable/live props. :)

    It’s not just food and drink, either. The Scottish play, and countless others, require stage blood that can magically disappear from a costume in time for the next show (which is a problem when your costumer makes the clothes out of something non-washable such as brocade). Sondheim’s “Merrily We Roll Along” calls for a character to have iodine thrown into her eyes. Honestly, I think playwrights do these things partly to test the ingenuity of the stage managers.

  2. Andrea

    Iodine in the eyes? I’ve been in that show (old version) twice, and seen the new version once, but that doesn’t ring a bell…what’s the context?

    The version of Dracula I was in used copious corn-syrup-based blood. Cleaning the costumes was bad enough; it never really did come off of the flooring…

  3. Captain Bluntschli

    Sure, but… sugar rush on stage, just when you need it!

  4. Tom Giordano

    This subject has been floating through my brain for a while now. While I think the logistical considerations are certainly something that the playwright should keep in mind, I think there’s more benefit in the very act of having food on stage than was really mentioned.

    There’s something very humanizing about people eating. It’s such an elemental part of existence, and the act of sharing food or drink with another person (or deliberately not sharing it) provides a rich canvas for exploring characters and their relationships. Admittedly, I suspect many playwrights aren’t consciously thinking this, but subconsciously they probably visualize people who are talking over a meal or over drinks as more alive than those who are just sitting in the living room.

    So rather than asking “Is this food/drink important to the text?”, I would ask “Is this food/drink important to the development of the characters?” Does it show a side of them that we wouldn’t otherwise see? As a director and as actors, what can we explore about the characters in this eating/drinking moment? The muffins in Earnest could easily be cut for plot reasons, but I think they’re great for showing what’s going on inside/between the characters at that moment. In Ideal Husband, there’s no mention of drinks in the script, but in our production it seemed natural to have drinks at the party, and it provided focus for various moments– Mabel taking Goring’s drink away from him, Chiltern focusing on his drink rather than on his wife. Etc.

    If it doesn’t add anything, sure, cut it. And a full meal is going to be irritating to deal with. But sometimes what seems incidental to the plot is a great opportunity. Worth playing with in rehearsal, at least, I would think. (A different set of logistical concerns, I realize…)

    • Andrea

      I don’t disagree — though much of what you’re talking about is more like a directorial choice than a playwriting one. Which, I think, was part of my point: don’t make the director’s job harder, gratuitously.

      I also object less to use of food that’s really purposeful and integral to plot and/or character development (not that those are really distinct, especially in a play) or even setting — e.g. Frankie and Johnnie, though I do find the food in that play fairly prohibitive in practical terms. Concrete is good, and it doesn’t get much more concrete than food.

      But you-the-playwright want to make sure the food is really worth the bother, if you’re going to put it into the script in a way that makes it hard for the director to use discretion about whether or not to keep it in.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s